Student comments from EPID600
Fall 2007
|
______________________________
|
“I appreciate the thoroughness of the instructions given for
all assignments and lectures and can see how that cuts down
on questions asked or need for clarifications; however sometimes
the material is "crowded" and difficult to read. Lecture slides
are very conscise and well formatted, however.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Tough class, but interesting!!!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/22)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Maybe when we do the review slides in the beginning of lab,
to go a little slower, just so we can copy things down and
absorb them - I felt like this week's was a little rushed.
But Anjum is very good! :)”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Originally I was not looking forward to these group meetings
due to negative experiences in past group based work. However,
my group is outstanding! Everyone is prepared, actively involved,
friendly, and efficient. Those who have missed meetings have
notified us a week in advance and still submitted their answers
to the case study to other members via email. Even though they
may not have physically been present during the meeting, their
input was still available. Furthermore, and perhaps most importantly,
if someone has a question there is always a member who helps
explain how and why the group has arrived at a particular answer.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Anjum does a great job recapping all the information Vic goes
over and is really helpful in pulling us into a quick discussion,
and in acting as a sounding board as we figure stuff out on
our own. She's great. Thanks!!!”
|
|
Stephen,
MPH student,
PUBH,
TA: Anjum
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I really enjoy this class and the group discussions are so
useful.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/27)
|
|
______________________________
|
“My group is excellent. Everyone participates and does their
homework prior to class. The group setting has been a great
device for learning.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“My group is great!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/21)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I feel very comfortable with going to Pam with questions. She
makes herself very available to us as a group and individually.
She also does a good job of summarizing concepts at the beginning
of recitation section. Great job overall!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/20)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I find that having the powerpoint slides--both class and lab--available
on the internet very helpful. It's nice when we are away from
class to have that information available to us.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I am really enjoying the course thus far. Professor Schoenbach
keeps lectures engaging and uses examples that are applicable
to everyday life.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/09/22)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I think our group has done a great job so far with the discussion.
I think it takes some time getting used to this time of learning
and communicating, but our TA and group have really worked
hard!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“You guys are great! I'm really enjoying this class so far!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Hi Emily, I must admit that I really only have a very general
feeling of everybody. I think it is too short of a time for
me to get more than that. Everyone in my group has participated
in each question in each module. I feel like I am still trying
to really understand the material so it is hard for me to judge
how well someone else knows it. This is my first internet class,
and I must tell you, I am really pleased with how personal
it is. I really have learned from what others have said, or
how they answered the questions. The accessibility of you and
Vic is also a pleasant surprise. Even though I am still trying
to balance the time, and I find the class very challenging,
I am enjoy it, and learning a lot. Thanks, Jeanne”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/16)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Emily is doing an outstanding job of keeping our group in the
loop. Her communication has been extremely helpful so far this
semester. Vic is also very informative and has set-up a wonderful
website that is completely separate from the dreaded Blackboard
(a system that can sometimes be "down" for hours!). My only
negative opinion about this course is that it feels like it
goes by WAY too quickly! I feel as though I do not have enough
time to really absorb everything before I start on the next
module, and I feel like this is really preventing me from fully
understanding everything. Now, mind you, I have been busy in
my personal life so far this semester (captain of the soccer
team, I moved into a new office building, and I just moved
into my new house), so I believe that has a lot to do with
it as well. But, still, it would be nice to go at a slower
pace, just to make sure I understand everything. Thanks for
everything so far! Fortunately, my life slows down after this
weekend, so I will have to reread everything. :)”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The way the case study individual submittals are set up, one
only has a few hours after work on Friday evening to read the
case study paper and solve the starred questions. The earlier
part of the work week is used by students to go through the
lecture materials and to read the book chapter. It would be
better to extend the individual submittal deadline to sometime
Saturday morning so that the student can either (1) stay up
all night and finish answering the questions, or (2) read the
case study the night before and get up early next morning to
finish answering the questions. The jokes and observations
in the PowerPoint slides are great. Keep 'em coming. Thanks.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Emily has been great to gide us in the right direction and
give us pointers.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/22)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far, this class has been a challenge on many levels. The
material is very interesting and sometimes I find it frustrating
that just as I think we are getting to a place of understanding,
we are moving on to something else. I do understand that this
is a survey course and so it probably has to be that way, but
the pace does not allow for any deeper examination of key issues.
As always, the online discussions are somewhat difficult, given
the complexity and amount of questions posed for each discussion.
It may be better to consider fewer questions per module, to
allow us the time to really examine the material and delve
deeper into answering and understanding the questions posed.
All in all, I have found it challenging but enjoyable and very
interesting. On a side note - I found it difficult to judge
and scale my fellow group members participation this early
in the class. I hope I did it fairly. Thanks”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/22)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This is my second online class ever, and I think it is very
well set up. There was no discussion between the class members
in my last class, and it was hard to tell what was going on.
I feel in the know and excited about this class. I also feel
everyone does their best to make sure they are a good and helpful
member of the group. I feel like I'm almost an epid 600 groupie,
I check my group site at least every night to see what my group
members are saying. It's a lot of fun to me.”
|
|
Erika,
MS student,
BIOS,
TA: Emily
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/16)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The online program is amazing. I was concerned about consensus
work but it really works out well. The knowledge of the group
and contributions everyone makes really works well. Professionals
that need to get a thorough set of skills in Epidemiological
research under their belts should look at this program.”
|
|
Monica,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Emily
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/20)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The course is great so far. I am learning a lot. Thanks!”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/17)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Kelly is working hard to keep us on track”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/20)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Depending how questions are divided up among group members
this evaluation is biased towards contributions made on blackboard.
While blackboard is the primary medium for group discussions,
it is possible for individuals to have collaborated with others
in the group over the phone or in private e-mails (especially
if they are traveling). Such collaborations would not be known
by the rest of the group.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It is much easier to evaluate the students who are always in
the same group of questions as myself, as there is more dialogue
between us.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“So far, so good. This is my second course online through the
Core Concepts program and I am definitely learning how to adapt
to an online forum class. EPI600 is definitely more thought
provoking than other courses, but I am enjoying the case study
analysis approach to this course.”
|
|
Harold,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Sarah
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/20)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great class ... case studies make us really learn the materials!
And makes my head hurt :)”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/24)
|
|
______________________________
|
“To be completely honest, I think the work load in this class
is obscene. I initially bypassed this class somehow and wound
up taking the following 3 Epidemiology courses over the past
year and a half. Going back to this class, which is clearly
a survey course, is actually more difficult because I had to
learn preliminary material on my own in order to complete those
other courses. Modules every week are very difficult, especially
with another class. The sheer amount of reading alone makes
this difficult. It is obvious to me this class is used to weed
people out. I have done very well in all other classes and
I am very afraid that this course is going to bring everything
I have done so far down.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/16)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It is enjoyable to participate in this course, but sometimes
I am really confused with some facts, because it is my first
time with epidemiology, and occasionally I do not understand
all the concepts used. I am improving.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/20)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Overall I feel that everyone does well in the discussion forums.
I think that it can be a little difficult to evaluate others
based on their answers because the first person to answer the
question is most likely to get the higher grade. I usually
get online on Sunday night or Monday mornings due to my work
schedule, by this time the first person as answered and if
you agree or had the exact same calculations and answers there
is not much more to say other than "i agree". I mean you could
just retype the calculation, but that does not really add to
the discussion.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Susan has been great for answering all questions, and she has
tact. She does a good job of guiding the group when we are
not on track. I think Vic should give her a raise.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great information. Learning more than I ever thought! One suggestion
I would make is to have a preprinted course pack to purchase
with all of the materials in it that are not in the text. I
spend a lot of time looking for material, printing, organizing,
etc the loose internet material that could be spent on studying.
I hope I didn't miss it if it's available, but all the bookstore
sent was the text.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/18)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Undoubtedly, a superior format for learning from the highest
caliber professor I have experienced. This course is first
humbling and always challenging.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/19)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Each week so far I have lead my individual group and they have
always been late with answering questions and so I have been
forced to submit my own answers without group consensus on
Monday nights which has been a bit frustrating but has forced
me never the less to really sort the questions out by myself.”
|
|
(1st peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/09/17)
|
|
______________________________
|
“EPID 600 is one of the most useful classes that Ive had at
UNC. It gives a good basis for thinking about scientific studies
as well as how to read scientific articles.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Enjoyed the course. Thank you for an enjoyable semester and
worthwhile class.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/03)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I believe that better case studies could be found for the various
topics.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Many of the questions asked in the labs can stimulate a
lot of discussion, usually due to their ambiguity. I think
it was good to talk about these questions at length, but my
group and I always felt pressed for time and ultimately had
to rush through the last questions.”
|
|
Mike,
PHD student,
NUTR,
TA: Chris
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Chris was always very helpful, and the powerpoint presentations
he provided us with were very useful in further understanding
the material. He was especially helpful when he met with me
the week that I was a facilitator, helping me make sure that
I understood all the concepts well. He was a great TA overall.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/10)
|
|
______________________________
|
“EPID600 is a great class that really gives you a great set
of skills to deal with a variety of public health issues.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This group always worked very well together, respected each
other answers, and learned from each other.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/11/30)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great enthusiasm for teaching and followed every rule.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/06)
|
|
______________________________
|
“My group was good! We generally worked well together.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I enjoyed the format of the course”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Classroom course,
2007/12/02)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thank you for your efforts to help us better understand epidemiology.
The case studies were excellent sources to help us learn the
concepts.”
|
|
Kathryn,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Bradley
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/03)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Despite the challenges of the study subject, this has been
the best class I have taken of the core certificate program
classes. The use of case study as a way of teaching the subject
matter has been most effective. If not anything, at least I
can walk away knowing that I am not intimidated by peer reviewed
journals anymore! Arigato, Si'yabonga(Zulu, SA/Zim), Ame'segenalehu(Amharic-Eth)
,Asante Sana (Kiswahili) and Sala Kahle”
|
|
Bemnet,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Bradley
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/03)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was the toughest class I have taken so far. That is a
good thing because it challenged me to think, a lot. The TA
was supportive, helpful, and available to help which was great.
This class requires a large amount of time and focus, but it
is well worth it.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This class, EPID 600, was an eye opening experience for me.
I have a new found respect for data collection and analysis!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I enjoyed working with each and every person in group 4.”
|
|
Jeanne,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Emily
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I would strongly recommend that you re-examine the expected
workload. I found it very difficult to absorb and truly learn
the material as we were on a crazy pace to complete the case
studies. As much as I looked forward to this course I am disappointed
in the return on investment.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/11/29)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The course was very interesting and fun. The math was overwhelming
but the course readings were informative and will help me in
my career.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/03)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I only wish I had more time to devote to the study of Epidemiology.
The material was spot-on and the case studies interesting.
The exams were challenging and stimulating and I learned as
much from the 'Exam' experience as the course materials. If
I had it to do over again I would reduce some of my other commitments
to have time to more fully participate in the group discussions.
I will be using the material learned in the class for years
to come.”
|
|
Robert,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Emily
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I was very intimidated at the beginning of the course. EPID600
is my first class in 10 years! Luckily, Dr. S and Emily were
very encouraging and responsive to any questions. The course
covers A LOT of material, but I think the case studies and
group work (which I am generally not a fan of)helped make sense
of many of the concepts. The feedback on the exams was excellent
- never have I had such a detailed response to my work.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/11/30)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Our TA, Emily, was terrific throughout the course from beginning
to end. Always willing to help us understand difficult concepts
and questions, but in a way that allowed us to figure it out
on our own. She was great!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Make no mistakes about it, this is a hard course! In particular
the case study questions and exams, are structured to truly
make you apply what you "think you know." There were many times,
I thought I understood something after reading it but quickly
realized when attempting the case study questions that I needed
to re-read the material or seek supplemental help. That said,
Dr. Vic, you provided ample examples and tools to help us understand
it. My TA was awesome and very approachable and very responsive.
Plus, my group was very supportive and members sought to make
sure that we understood the concepts and their application.
Even when I went out on a limb to answer a question (knew I
wasn't doing it correctly), my group mates encouraged me and
prompted/pointed me until I figured it out. Although the material
is challenging, the resources and support system serve to enhance
the learning experience. I've been out of school for almost
a decade and was apprehensive but soon realized that we are
set up to succeed in this course. Thanks!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/11)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a great class - wish i could have taken it in person!
Kelly is a great TA and very helpful... i think i was blessed
with the discussion group i was in - they were all superstars!”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Kelly is a super TA. She was always helpful and assisted the
forum discussions appropriately. She responded to questions
and email quickly. I feel her assistance was invaluable to
my learning.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The has been the most through provoking class of my lifetime
educational experience. I would strongly urge students to take
the BIOStats course prior to this one, just to have a background
in understanding the statistics references present in study
material. However, it was never necessary in the course to
have this background, another appreciated factor.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It will be helpful to maintain a current list of the group
in Blackboard. Please make sure that all the slides all
well-recorded.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/08)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Great class. Challenging for my first internet class, but I
learned a lot.”
|
|
Chris,
CERT student,
PHCP,
TA: Susan
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was an excellent class, and I really enjoyed the group
work on the case studies. The readings were interesting, and
the questions were relevant to the topics covered in the textbook
and lectures. The case study work helped me to better understand
the concepts and how they are applied in actual practice.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/04)
|
|
______________________________
|
“In general, rating "participation on group discussion forums"
by using "missed __ or more discussion forms ..." was difficult
when students dropping out of the class/forum was not something
shared with the other members of the group, i.e. somewhere
along in the semester, a student's name would just disappear
off the list -- if one noticed -- but it was difficult to know
if they were a non-participant due to leaving the course or
just missing the forum.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/09)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This was a great class... my first internet one. You guys not
only brought out the material but made it come alive. A special
thanks to Susan. She's sharp, has a good heart and even though
I couldn't read it, I think I heard her laugh a few times.”
|
|
Roger,
CERT student,
FEPI,
TA: Susan
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/05)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Susan is the absolute best! If every teaching assistant were
as responsive and as positive as she is, we would all be incredibly
successful. Susan has the ability to point you in the right
direction while still requiring you to think for yourself.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/11/30)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Susan was an excellent TA. She always responded to e-mails
very promptly. Her comments and suggestions were very helpful
and led our group in the right direction without giving too
much assistance. I think she did an outstanding job throughout
the semester.”
|
|
(2nd peer evaluation,
Internet course,
2007/12/07)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Course is confusing in the following ways, the original syllabus was confusing in layout, the submission dates for tests and answer sets weren't explained fully in the beginning, and one point- attendance? Kind of a bummer that people are paying money for a graduate degree and not taking in the class, plus the prevalence of people using facebook or emailing during lecture is distracting.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/4/2007 12:52:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I liked doing the case studies for the most part. Sitting in lecture isn't fun for me. I like being able to apply material that we learn in lecture into something practical. I feel like some of the case studies were bad. In fact I wonder how some of them got funded in the first place. I feel like some of them showed that if you look hard enough for something then there is a potential for any and everything to make you sick. I look forward to taking more EPID classes. Overall my experience was intellectually stimulating and challenging.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/5/2007 7:18:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The lectures were paced far to slow. The case studies involved more busy work than problem solving .”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/5/2007 9:23:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The case study & group work is a nice way to learn the material.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/6/2007 2:08:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thank you!”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/6/2007 5:29:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“great job!”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/7/2007 12:51:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The exam hints were often unhelpful.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/7/2007 3:38:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“This is a great course that helped me learn how to read scientific journal articles.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/7/2007 4:29:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Interesting course.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/9/2007 11:00:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“My favorite class was the outbreak investigation one, with the guest speaker.....the subject matter was fascinating.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/10/2007 4:39:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Thought the case studies were great ways to really understand the material!!!”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/10/2007 9:57:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“lectures were very helpful and brief and it was good. Thanks!”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/1/2007 7:37:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Case studies were very helpful.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/2/2007 4:21:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“It may help to have the lab section that the TA's teach go over what was just talked about in lecture rather than waiting a week- this may help keep larger ideas clear.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/5/2007 4:29:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“By the end of the semester I was very tired of completing case studies! They were good preparation for the exams, but a little more variety in lab would have been appreciated.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/6/2007 12:31:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I thought the course was pretty great. I found most of the case studies incredibly interesting. My only critique would be to make the lab that addresses exam 3 earlier in the semester. It would have made it a lot easier to get a solid headstart on it.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/6/2007 1:46:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Case studies were very involved but I learned a lot.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
11/29/2007 11:53:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“I enjoyed the format of the course lectures and case studies. This was the first time in college that I had weekly group work, and it was definitely a great experience. Our group dynamic was wonderful!”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/3/2007 12:14:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The course material was generally interesting. I was often frustrated by the tests--the amount of time that they took and the idea that any reason, no matter how inane, warranted an extension. It made it difficult to force myself to find the time to work the exam. I also did not like the times scheduled for the case study modules--I thought it was too late in the evening (I often missed the last bus). However, the material covered in them and what I learned in doing them was very useful and I learned a lot from doing them as well as from other members of my group.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/3/2007 8:34:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“lectures need to be simplified. excess information confuses.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/5/2007 12:22:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Lectures were concise and contained the most relevant information that would assist us on a particular case study.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/5/2007 1:56:00 AM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“The lab should be worth more. I put more work into the lab as a whole than any other assignment in the class.”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/6/2007 10:41:00 PM)
|
|
______________________________
|
“Case studies were long, but informative and good preparation for exam material”
|
|
(taeval2,
Classroom course,
12/11/2007 7:18:00 PM)
|
(An additional 19 comments were received but the students did not
authorize their dissemination.)
2007cd,
compiled 12/18/2007 |